ANNOUNCEMENTS
New Delhi : In a fillip to provide youth address skills gaps in digital skills towards sustainability, TERI SAS signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Cisco Networking Academy as a part of their long-term collaborative engagement to empower youth with career possibilities in this niche area. As a part of MOU, TERI SAS will have access to a comprehensive technology skills and career building program with a global reputation for preparing youth and development enthusiasts for success in a connected world, that now has a major link to the sustainable development goals.
In his address Prof Prateek Sharma, VC TERI SAS, hailed the MoU as a first of its kind initiative in the sustainability sector in India. “ As the world at COP 27 debates to involve skilled youth who can be torch bearers of digital sustainability, we at TERI SAS along with Cisco Academy will be able to teach technology skills and career building to students using the Cisco Networking Academy curriculum and tools, in order to improve career and economic opportunities, making youth savvy towards digital skills in the development sector, adding to a newer workforce of the future.
Collaborating with the Cisco Networking Academy guarantees high quality training, in skills relevant to the ICT industry, improving employment opportunities of youth in India, who when employed with the right skill sets will possess the power to solve the world’s toughest problems in sustainability, through their digitally savvy acumen.”
This joint MoU will enable students to leverage the Cisco networking Academy program skills and knowledge and implement the same in their subject areas of environment, climate change, geo spatial data and many more areas related to sustainable development.
The event was held in a hybrid mode and was attended by around 300 students in person and virtually on Cisco Webex. Mr. Ishvinder Singh, India lead – NetAcad & Skills, Social Innovation Group, CISCO exchanged the MoU with Mr. Kamal Sharma, Registrar, TERI SAS. Ms Marcella O’Shea, Regional Manager APJC, Corporate Affairs, Cisco from Singapore joined the session virtually via Webex and addressed the students.
Read More“The next 1,000 unicorns won’t be search engines or social media companies, they’ll be sustainable, scalable innovators — startups that help the world decarbonise and make the energy transition affordable for all consumers,” Larry Fink, chairman and CEO of US-based multinational investment management corporation BlackRock said in his annual letter to CEOs in January this year.
While companies in the developed economies have been focusing more on environment, social, and corporate governance (ESG), for their Indian counterparts it’s for long been an exercise-driven largely by the pressure from investors and the need to maintain their brand image.
As per US-based management consulting firm Boston Consulting Group’s Report on Readiness of Indian Industries towards Climate Change Guidelines of COP26, which was published in April this year, organisations were adopting sustainable business practices for select reasons including brand image, growth, and pressure from investors and stakeholders such as rating agencies, customers, employees and so on.
“About 51% of the organisations ranked pressure from stakeholders as one of their top reasons to invest in sustainability initiatives, especially those focusing on ESG- based considerations,” it said.
Experts point out that around 25 countries have made ESG disclosures mandatory and that number is only going to grow in the coming years. In India, the top 1,000 listed companies (by market capitalisation) have to mandatorily file Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) from the current financial year.
Reporting ESG performance by large companies is likely to have a trickle-down effect on the entire business ecosystem.
And startups, too, are feeling the heat.
Sanjeev Kumar Singhal, chairman, the Sustainability Reporting Standards Board, set up by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), points out that ESG has become imperative to the success of any business.
“BRSR or ESG parameters would become the norm of the day for all businesses. A high score on ESG norms will give an added advantage to startups and they will be able to attract better talent and funds,” he says.
To be sure, private-equity (PE) investors regularly undertake pre and post- investment checks on ESG performance in startups.
Satish Ramchandani, co-founder, Updapt, an ESG-tech firm that otters ESG as a SaaS-based solution, points out that several of its clients are startups. “There is no escape from ESG. The venture capital (VC) community in India, too, is catching up” he says.
BRSR is likely to become mandatory for all listed companies in the near future and is a key action point for India to reach the net-zero goal by 2070. “Startups, too, would be part of this ecosystem when they want to get listed on stock exchanges or to be supply-chain partners with corporates that are either large or listed,” adds Ramchandani.
Rajesh K, chief quality and sustainability officer at direct-to-consumer meat brand Licious believes that while investors have started to look at companies through the ESG lens, it is more an assessment of the business to ensure the long-term sustainability and resilience to uncertainties and risks arising due to various aspects of ESG.
“We are living in a world where climate action and sustainability issues are imminent and all stakeholders expect businesses to be responsible in carrying out the business objectives considering needs of our future generations.” he savs.
N Chandrasekhar, founder, Jivoule Biofuels, a Hyderabad-based biodiesel production startup, points out that already there is a perceptible change in the attitude of investors towards ESG performance in investee companies. “Investors are very particular on ESG progress, especially after investment”.
Investors demand transparency, right metrics reporting, and the measurement of impact-generated, among other things. “No greenwashing practices are tolerated,” he adds.
However, most challenges faced by startups in meeting ESG parameters arise from the lack of awareness of their ESG impact, say experts.
Chandrasekhar adds that resource constraints add to their challenges in meeting ESG performance expectations.
Just as how investors help startups bring in corporate governance, they also help set standards (both internally and externally) to ESG reporting, which automatically orients startups in that direction. However, startup founders point out that ESG compliance is expensive and funds diverted for the same would add to financial burden.
“It needs prior planning and is a part of the culture,” says Tarun Jami, founder of climate-tech startup Green Jams.
The ESG myth
Most startups operate on the philosophy of‘hyper-growth’, which means they dedicate all their resources to acquiring customers. In most cases, this means sacrificing early profits to control market share and make super-normal profits in the future.
“Hence, some startups treat ESG as an additional cost. However, it is a misconception,” says Sandeep Kumar Mohanty, partner, ESG Strategy and Net- Zero at global consulting firm PwC.
Mohanty points out that ESG is not about investing money and time to manage compliance. “It is more about changing our mindset and how we do business.”
Experts point out that ESG-focused startups have stood out of late. They have attracted investors at a better capital cost and accelerated sales while optimising the use of resources. They also continue to attract young talent.
Mainstreaming ESG
VCs could play a key role in mainstreaming ESG in the Indian startup ecosystem. In Europe and the US, the VC community has been ahead of the curve in terms of sensitising startups about ESG issues.
“However we don’t find enough conversations of this kind happening in India,” says Timothy Hendrix, general partner at San Francisco-based early-stage VC firm Agility Ventures, adding that investors have been telling large companies to invest in ESG to bring more transparency and accountability in their business.
“We are now asking the businesses at the startup stage to do so from the beginning so that they can be both — have a growth mindset and be sustainable at the same time,” says Hendrix.
Jami, meanwhile, points out that considering how most VCs were predominantly tech investors, it takes a lot of grit to come out of their comfort zones to relearn, recalculate and re-evaluate their investment theses based on ESG parameters. It is now time for the founders to bite the bullet.
Startups can begin their sustainability journey in a small way, says Ramchandani…
"BRSR or ESG parameters would become the norm of the day for all businesses. A high score on ESG norms will give an added advantage to startuJ2S and they will be able to attract better talent and funds.
— Sanjeev Kumar Singhal, Chairman, Sustainability Reporting Standards Board
VCs on the boards of startups are in a good position to influence their thought process to achieve growth in a sustainable manner. However, for any ESG-focussed startup to attract the attention of VCs, they have to meet the acid test of financial viability, says Viney Sawhney, a professor at the Harvard University. Sawhney and Hendrix were recently in India to conduct a workshop on VC and ESG investing for startups, along with New Delhi-based Teri School of Advanced Studies.
Sawhney’s observations were that the failure risk of ESG-related ventures is low. However, most startup founders in India are still weaned towards retail, SaaS, and e-commerce ventures which have high failure rates. As a result, the pipeline for ESG ventures is not enough. “There is a lack of high-quality deal flow in ESG,” he adds.
However, given the agriculture and climate-related issues faced in India, there is a huge opportunity for ESG ventures to deliver an internal rate of return (IRR) in the range of 15% to 20%. That level of IRR is necessary for VCs to get interested in such ventures. To deliver such levels of IRR, the projects have to be well thought through, funded, and executed, he says.
Sawhney is of the view that lack of awareness among entrepreneurs is one of the key reasons for the dearth of high-quality ESG ventures in India. “In the US, when someone wants to start up, they first join a course to get a better understanding of the business ecosystem and the do’s and don’ts that they should be mindful of. In India, there are hardly any courses that give entrepreneurs such in-depth knowledge,” he adds.
The government, too, needs to play a significant role in propagating ESG practices among the startup ecosystem, says Sawhney.
“If India wants to mainstream ESG, startups and VCs have to play a key role,” he concludes.
Read MoreThere is a need for a wider research and debate to arrive at the energy specific subsidies, which may be offered to to the socially unprivileged.
New Delhi: There have been recent discussions focusing on energy related support measures, both at the international level as well as within India. Availability of energy, and its affordability, has got severely impacted due to an unexpected military conflict in Europe. This has also halted global energy transition, which was moving at a smooth pace under the net-zero commitments, amidst large-scale adoption of renewables. And, within our own country, a debate has got spurred on energy related support measures for the lesser affluent sections of the society.
As part of our research work, we estimated the consumption of energy, encompassing both electric and non-electric formats, along with the related costs, to arrive at the percentage energy expenditure of an individual as part of her annual income. We undertook this study for the six states of India - Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Punjab.
Our analysis showed that annual per capita consumption of energy was in the range of 300 kgoe, equally split between electrical and non-electrical formats (refer figure 1). Within the fossil group, diesel was having a high share, indicating its widespread use as a commercial fuel. In terms of energy related expenses, our study depicted a range from INR 15,000 - 20,000, with a slightly higher share attributed to non-electric energy (refer figure 2). In terms of energy expenses as a share of annual per capita earnings, this research indicated a range of 12-15%, similar to global average values (refer figure 3).
Per capita income and per capita electricity consumption for these states was obtained from the RBI datasets. State-wise consumption of non-electric fuels (LPG, diesel and gasoline), as taken from PPAC report, was divided by the states’ population to arrive at the per capita energy consumption. Energy consumption in all forms was converted into oil equivalent terms, using standard calorific values. Tariff for electricity was computed by dividing the revenue generated with the sale of power, for domestic category of consumers (PFC dataset). For non-electric fuels, prices as prevalent during March 2019 were taken taken from the portal petroldieselprice.com.
Evolving technologies, innovative business models and opening up of energy markets, accentuated by decarbonization and electrification of the economy, had made it a challenge for the stakeholders in terms of choosing the most optimum format, among all possible permutations. Policy makers may need to choose from the various forms of energy which are required to be subsidized and the possible alternatives.
End-consumers may seek clarity in terms of fuel availability at stable price-points, with minimal change(s) in regulations. For example, subsidized tariff for consumers, amidst increasing prices of LPG and gasoline, may nudge households to adopt induction cookstoves and EVs. Similarly, rationalizing power tariffs and the proposed carbon taxation, under the Energy Conservation Act, may accelerate deployment of solar rooftop systems. Any increase in price of CNG may encourage Bio-CNG based flexi- fuel vehicles. Options shall increase the elasticity of energy consumption, typically considered inelastic.
This calls for a wider research and debate to arrive at the energy specific subsidies, which may be offered to the socially unprivileged. As a first step, minimum lifeline energy requirements can be estimated for different states, considering the existing level of expenses, climatic conditions, besides their social and demographic parameters. Other factors can include locally available fuel esources, conversion technology and the associated energy output (kgoe), market price, carbon intensity along with alternatives.
Subsidies can be extended in terms of total calorific value in place of monetary terms, possibly pegged to their carbon intensity.
This strategy shall enable a consumer opting for the most economical form of energy, which is technologically sound besides being environmentally benign, leading to sustainable and inclusive development of the Indian economy.
[This piece was written exclusively for ETEnergyworld by Dr Sapan Thapar, Head, Department of Sustainable Engineering, TERI School of Advanced Studies].
Date | News Title | Source |
11-November-2022 | TERI School Of Advanced Studie... | India Education Diary (Online) |
11-October-2022 | Mainstreaming sustainability: ... | The Economic Times (Online) |
29-September-2022 | OPINION: Energy expenses and a... | ETEnergyWorld (Online) |
30-June-2022 | A direct approach to conservat... | The Hindu; Page No. 07 |
29-June-2022 | Uttarakhand mein Jal Prabandha... | Hindustan (Hindi Edition Dehradun); Page No. 04 |
29-June-2022 | Raajya Ke 1,219 Praakritik Jha... | Amar Ujjala (Dehradun My City Edtion); Page No. 01 |
26-June-2022 | Heat, pollution hurt health of... | Hindustan Times (Online) |
25-June-2022 | Poor Air Quality, Extreme Weat... | Ahmedabad Mirror (Online) |
30-May-2022 | On hold - Haryana's green ... | The Time of India |
21-May-2022 | Explainer: What is carbon pric... | Moneycontrol(Online) |
Carbon pricing is the value ascribed to the external costs – usually social costs – of pollution emitted by an industry. The price on carbon emissions is applied either through a carbon tax or an emission trading system.
Representative Image Source: AP
In the 1920s, a British economist, Arthur Pigou, highlighted the social benefits of making industries pay for the costs of the pollution they caused. In time, this concept was taken up in different ways, which have led to the concept of ‘carbon pricing’.
According to the World Bank, carbon pricing is the value ascribed to the external costs of pollution emitted by an industry. External costs are those that do not affect the industry itself directly – most industries receive the full benefits of fossil fuel consumption, but only bear a trivial fraction of its climatic cost. Instead, public systems pay a socially tragic price – such as the costs of losing crops because of poisoned air/water and health care costs because of heat/cold waves or extreme weather events from global warming.
Carbon pricing is an economic tool used to push industries, households and governments to bring down emissions and invest in cleaner options. It helps in shifting the burden of damage caused by pollution onto those responsible for the pollution but does not dictate how or where emissions can be reduced. Instead, it puts an economic value to pollution and allows polluters to decide whether to reduce emissions or continue polluting but pay the price for it.
Carbon pricing/taxes/trade are under the control of a country’s government. The government decides what taxes to levy and polluters pay these taxes to the government. Ideally, these taxes should be used to either offset the extra burden of carbon taxation on low-income groups or on remedial projects to offset the effects of pollution.
Why a price on carbon?
Carbon is priced because carbon-based gases (of which carbon dioxide or CO2 is most prevalent) are the most abundant greenhouse gases (GHGs) in most emissions. Therefore, pricing carbon provides an incentive for households, firms, industries, and governments to reduce emissions cost-effectively.
According to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report (March 2022), the window of action for meeting the goals set by the Paris Convention (a reduction in GHG emissions such that global warming is restricted to 1.5–2 degrees C above pre-industrial times) is rapidly closing. The report, titled Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability states that without immediate action, rising global temperatures and climate change with create conditions beyond human tolerance.
Currently, the price on carbon emissions is applied in two ways; one is through a carbon tax, and the other through a cap-and-trading or emission trading system (ETS).
What is carbon tax?
Carbon taxes are the prices that governments impose on polluters for each metric ton of CO2 emissions (mt CO2e) generated. These taxes are levied on coal, oil products, and natural gases, according to their carbon contents. The advantages of levying carbon taxes are many. By internalising the externality of pollution costs, the tax motivates industries to improve energy efficiencies, move towards low-carbon fuels and renewable energy sources. The concept of carbon taxation can also be applied to other GHGs and pollutants. In addition, carbon taxes are fairly easy to administer as add-ons to already existent fuel taxes and generate revenue for governments that can be routed towards funding other aspects of the sustainable development goals.
Carbon taxes are, however, are not problem-free. One of the main arguments against carbon taxes is that they make fossil fuels more expensive, which will disproportionately affect people of lower income groups. In addition, carbon taxes may discourage investment and economic growth as businesses may shift production into countries without carbon taxes. Another issue with carbon taxation can centre on how the revenues collected from the taxes are utilised – should they be used towards alleviating tax burdens on workers due to rising fuel prices or towards repairing environmental degradation? Finally, the administrative costs of monitoring and measuring emissions, and uncertainties in measuring the social costs of carbon pollution can make carbon taxation a difficult task.
Individuals and households bear the brunt of carbon taxes when the price of the tax – which is usually directly levied on an industry – trickles down to consumer prices.
What is carbon trading? What are carbon credits?
Carbon trading is a market-based approach to pricing carbon emissions by putting a cap on or limiting the total amount of carbon-based pollution that can be produced. In this system, a central authority, in most cases, governments, allocate or sell a limited number (set as a cap) of permits that allow a specified amount of emissions over a period of time. In this system, each polluter is allotted a specific quota or allowance of pollution that it can emit.
However, polluters are then allowed to trade these permits with each other. For example, if a polluter manages to reduce its carbon emissions to levels lower than its assigned permit values, it is allowed to sell the right to emit carbon to another polluter which may be producing more emissions than it has permits for.
A carbon credit is a generic term for a tradeable certificate or permit representing the right to emit a certain amount of CO2 (usually 1 metric ton) or an equivalent amount of different GHGs. It is, in a sense, the basic trading unit for carbon markets.
The carbon trading market was set up in 1997, after the Kyoto Protocol was signed. Under this protocol, all participating countries were to set and adhere to a limit on their carbon emissions over a series of commitment periods. However, the protocol also allowed countries to trade emissions permits with each other. Apart from these permits, other tradeable carbon commodities could also be used, including carbon removal units (from activities such as reforestation), emission reduction units, and certified emission reductions (from clean development mechanism projects).
The prices in cap-and-trade schemes, which use carbon credits, are market driven (meaning that their prices vary according to demand and supply), although the government controls how many units/credits are allotted to each industry/stakeholder, and so how many credits are available for sale on the whole.
Carbon is priced because carbon-based gases, primarily carbon dioxide, are the most abundant greenhouse gases in most emissions. Photo by marcinjozwiak/Pixabay.
Criticisms of the carbon pricing system
Currently, the Environmental Defense Fund states that the cap-and-trade system is the most “economically and environmentally” sound approach to limit emissions and mitigate global warming. This is because the cap sets a firm limit on pollution and trading encourages cutting emissions in the most cost-effective manner.
However, there are several arguments that have been put forward (apart from the issues on carbon taxation) to highlight that carbon pricing, including carbon trading is insufficient to mitigate climate change. These arguments point out that carbon pricing places more importance on increasing efficiency than on effectiveness and encourages optimisation of existing systems rather than on transforming them to reduce pollution. Furthermore, it has been pointed out that current issues with emissions are a fundamental systemic problem of society, and not just a market problem; therefore, they will require more than just a ‘price on pollution’ to overcome.
“First and foremost, one must remember that carbon pricing, especially carbon taxation, is a tool to make cutting carbon emissions more economical – it is not necessarily a tool to cut the total amount of carbon produced”, says Nandan Nawn, a professor at the Department of Policy and Management Studies, TERI School of Advanced Studies and a member of the Biodiversity Collaborative.
“If we take the example of pollution from cars, a tax may not incentivise the owner-users to reduce the use of fossil fuels. After all, in urban areas, owning and using many cars is more of a status symbol, just like owning land in the rural areas. There are just too many incentives – EMI (equated monthly installment) is the most important – that fits nicely with this ‘aspiration’. For most users, fossil fuel is an ‘essential commodity’ and the quantum of its use is independent of price changes. On the other hand, making the emission standards stricter has the potential to reduce the pollution emitted by a running engine per unit of time. But according to ‘Jevons Paradox’ or the ‘rebound effect’ (expounded by William Stanley Jevons at the House of Commons two and a half centuries ago), if the rise in car numbers increases at a rate higher than the rate at which emissions are reduced, total emission will increase. There are no easy solutions here, given the political economy of carbon in India,” Nawn explains.
In addition to these issues, unlike how the cap-and-trade program drove innovations to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions from power plants, the rise in technological innovations for reducing carbon emissions have not met with the same success. Although there is some evidence that innovations in low-carbon technologies are being driven by the European Union’s ETS (EU ETS) and China’s ETS, there are doubts that this will help in driving climate change mitigation at the desired rate.
What is the current rate at which carbon is priced?
According to The World Bank’s Global Carbon Pricing Dashboard as of April 2021, global carbon pricing initiatives range from less than $1 to as high as $137 per mt CO2e. There are currently 65 carbon pricing initiatives across 45 national jurisdictions. In 2021, these initiatives would cover 11.65 Gmt CO2e, which represents 21.5% of the global GHG emissions. However, less than 1% of the global emissions (5 out of 65 initiatives) are currently priced at close to or above the least estimated social cost of carbon, which, according to the IMF, is 75 USD per mt CO2e. A publication in 2021 in the journal Environmental Research Letters, places the social cost of carbon at a whopping >3000 USD per mt CO2e if climate-economy feedbacks and temperature variabilities are taken into account. As of November 2021, the average weighted price of carbon stood at 3.37 USD per mt CO2e.
How does carbon pricing work in India?
Currently, India does not have any explicit carbon pricing or cap-and-trade mechanisms; instead, it has an array of schemes that place an implicit price on carbon. The Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) scheme aims to reduce emissions from energy intensive industrial sectors by setting specific energy reduction targets. Industries that exceed the targets are awarded Energy Saving Certificates (ESCerts), each of which is equal to one metric tonne of oil. Those industries unable to meet the targets are required to buy ESCerts (from units that have exceeded their targets) through a centralised trading mechanisms hosted by the Indian Energy Exchange.
The Coal Cess is a tax on coal that was introduced in 2010, which aimed to use the collected revenue to finance clean-energy initiatives and research via the National Clean Energy Fund. However, the idea failed to achieve significant outcomes as a large part of the collected revenue remained unutilised. In 2017, the coal cess was abolished and replaced by the Goods and Services (GST) Compensation Cess; the proceeds of this tax are used to compensate states for revenue losses due to a shift to the new indirect tax regime.
Renewable Purchase Obligations (RPOs) and Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) are aimed at encouraging India’s growing renewable energy sector. All electricity distribution agencies are required to source a specific minimum of their electricity requirements from renewable energy sources. For each state, the RPO is fixed and regulated by the respective State Electricity Regulatory Commission. The RECs are market-based instruments that aid in achieving RPOs through trading at power exchanges.
Internal Carbon Pricing is a tool used by the private sector in India to reduce emissions voluntarily, so that they can channel investments into cleaner and more energy-efficient technologies to meet corporate sustainability goals. Currently many major Indian private companies such as Mahindra and Mahindra, Tata, Infosys, and Wipro, use ICP to lower their carbon footprints.
Can I participate in carbon trading?
Households and individuals at this stage, cannot directly participate in carbon trading, as carbon emissions calculations at such small scales are not very accurate. Households may be part of a larger trading scheme, where the carbon emissions of an area – for example, an entire city – are calculated, and used as measures to note increases/decreases in carbon emission profiles. The main issue with the carbon credit system currently, especially for small businesses or individual land holders, is that agencies that provide credentials for and evaluate carbon credit generation, charge very high fees, which may not be offset by the income generated from selling the carbon credits themselves.
Plot No. 10, Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi - 110 070, India.
Tel. +91 11 71800222 (25 lines).
Website : www.terisas.ac.in
Email id : registrar@terisas.ac.in
Site Map
© Copyright © 2023, TERI SAS, All rights reserved.