ANNOUNCEMENTS
New Delhi : In a fillip to provide youth address skills gaps in digital skills towards sustainability, TERI SAS signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Cisco Networking Academy as a part of their long-term collaborative engagement to empower youth with career possibilities in this niche area. As a part of MOU, TERI SAS will have access to a comprehensive technology skills and career building program with a global reputation for preparing youth and development enthusiasts for success in a connected world, that now has a major link to the sustainable development goals.
In his address Prof Prateek Sharma, VC TERI SAS, hailed the MoU as a first of its kind initiative in the sustainability sector in India. “ As the world at COP 27 debates to involve skilled youth who can be torch bearers of digital sustainability, we at TERI SAS along with Cisco Academy will be able to teach technology skills and career building to students using the Cisco Networking Academy curriculum and tools, in order to improve career and economic opportunities, making youth savvy towards digital skills in the development sector, adding to a newer workforce of the future.
Collaborating with the Cisco Networking Academy guarantees high quality training, in skills relevant to the ICT industry, improving employment opportunities of youth in India, who when employed with the right skill sets will possess the power to solve the world’s toughest problems in sustainability, through their digitally savvy acumen.”
This joint MoU will enable students to leverage the Cisco networking Academy program skills and knowledge and implement the same in their subject areas of environment, climate change, geo spatial data and many more areas related to sustainable development.
The event was held in a hybrid mode and was attended by around 300 students in person and virtually on Cisco Webex. Mr. Ishvinder Singh, India lead – NetAcad & Skills, Social Innovation Group, CISCO exchanged the MoU with Mr. Kamal Sharma, Registrar, TERI SAS. Ms Marcella O’Shea, Regional Manager APJC, Corporate Affairs, Cisco from Singapore joined the session virtually via Webex and addressed the students.
Read More“The next 1,000 unicorns won’t be search engines or social media companies, they’ll be sustainable, scalable innovators — startups that help the world decarbonise and make the energy transition affordable for all consumers,” Larry Fink, chairman and CEO of US-based multinational investment management corporation BlackRock said in his annual letter to CEOs in January this year.
While companies in the developed economies have been focusing more on environment, social, and corporate governance (ESG), for their Indian counterparts it’s for long been an exercise-driven largely by the pressure from investors and the need to maintain their brand image.
As per US-based management consulting firm Boston Consulting Group’s Report on Readiness of Indian Industries towards Climate Change Guidelines of COP26, which was published in April this year, organisations were adopting sustainable business practices for select reasons including brand image, growth, and pressure from investors and stakeholders such as rating agencies, customers, employees and so on.
“About 51% of the organisations ranked pressure from stakeholders as one of their top reasons to invest in sustainability initiatives, especially those focusing on ESG- based considerations,” it said.
Experts point out that around 25 countries have made ESG disclosures mandatory and that number is only going to grow in the coming years. In India, the top 1,000 listed companies (by market capitalisation) have to mandatorily file Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) from the current financial year.
Reporting ESG performance by large companies is likely to have a trickle-down effect on the entire business ecosystem.
And startups, too, are feeling the heat.
Sanjeev Kumar Singhal, chairman, the Sustainability Reporting Standards Board, set up by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), points out that ESG has become imperative to the success of any business.
“BRSR or ESG parameters would become the norm of the day for all businesses. A high score on ESG norms will give an added advantage to startups and they will be able to attract better talent and funds,” he says.
To be sure, private-equity (PE) investors regularly undertake pre and post- investment checks on ESG performance in startups.
Satish Ramchandani, co-founder, Updapt, an ESG-tech firm that otters ESG as a SaaS-based solution, points out that several of its clients are startups. “There is no escape from ESG. The venture capital (VC) community in India, too, is catching up” he says.
BRSR is likely to become mandatory for all listed companies in the near future and is a key action point for India to reach the net-zero goal by 2070. “Startups, too, would be part of this ecosystem when they want to get listed on stock exchanges or to be supply-chain partners with corporates that are either large or listed,” adds Ramchandani.
Rajesh K, chief quality and sustainability officer at direct-to-consumer meat brand Licious believes that while investors have started to look at companies through the ESG lens, it is more an assessment of the business to ensure the long-term sustainability and resilience to uncertainties and risks arising due to various aspects of ESG.
“We are living in a world where climate action and sustainability issues are imminent and all stakeholders expect businesses to be responsible in carrying out the business objectives considering needs of our future generations.” he savs.
N Chandrasekhar, founder, Jivoule Biofuels, a Hyderabad-based biodiesel production startup, points out that already there is a perceptible change in the attitude of investors towards ESG performance in investee companies. “Investors are very particular on ESG progress, especially after investment”.
Investors demand transparency, right metrics reporting, and the measurement of impact-generated, among other things. “No greenwashing practices are tolerated,” he adds.
However, most challenges faced by startups in meeting ESG parameters arise from the lack of awareness of their ESG impact, say experts.
Chandrasekhar adds that resource constraints add to their challenges in meeting ESG performance expectations.
Just as how investors help startups bring in corporate governance, they also help set standards (both internally and externally) to ESG reporting, which automatically orients startups in that direction. However, startup founders point out that ESG compliance is expensive and funds diverted for the same would add to financial burden.
“It needs prior planning and is a part of the culture,” says Tarun Jami, founder of climate-tech startup Green Jams.
The ESG myth
Most startups operate on the philosophy of‘hyper-growth’, which means they dedicate all their resources to acquiring customers. In most cases, this means sacrificing early profits to control market share and make super-normal profits in the future.
“Hence, some startups treat ESG as an additional cost. However, it is a misconception,” says Sandeep Kumar Mohanty, partner, ESG Strategy and Net- Zero at global consulting firm PwC.
Mohanty points out that ESG is not about investing money and time to manage compliance. “It is more about changing our mindset and how we do business.”
Experts point out that ESG-focused startups have stood out of late. They have attracted investors at a better capital cost and accelerated sales while optimising the use of resources. They also continue to attract young talent.
Mainstreaming ESG
VCs could play a key role in mainstreaming ESG in the Indian startup ecosystem. In Europe and the US, the VC community has been ahead of the curve in terms of sensitising startups about ESG issues.
“However we don’t find enough conversations of this kind happening in India,” says Timothy Hendrix, general partner at San Francisco-based early-stage VC firm Agility Ventures, adding that investors have been telling large companies to invest in ESG to bring more transparency and accountability in their business.
“We are now asking the businesses at the startup stage to do so from the beginning so that they can be both — have a growth mindset and be sustainable at the same time,” says Hendrix.
Jami, meanwhile, points out that considering how most VCs were predominantly tech investors, it takes a lot of grit to come out of their comfort zones to relearn, recalculate and re-evaluate their investment theses based on ESG parameters. It is now time for the founders to bite the bullet.
Startups can begin their sustainability journey in a small way, says Ramchandani…
"BRSR or ESG parameters would become the norm of the day for all businesses. A high score on ESG norms will give an added advantage to startuJ2S and they will be able to attract better talent and funds.
— Sanjeev Kumar Singhal, Chairman, Sustainability Reporting Standards Board
VCs on the boards of startups are in a good position to influence their thought process to achieve growth in a sustainable manner. However, for any ESG-focussed startup to attract the attention of VCs, they have to meet the acid test of financial viability, says Viney Sawhney, a professor at the Harvard University. Sawhney and Hendrix were recently in India to conduct a workshop on VC and ESG investing for startups, along with New Delhi-based Teri School of Advanced Studies.
Sawhney’s observations were that the failure risk of ESG-related ventures is low. However, most startup founders in India are still weaned towards retail, SaaS, and e-commerce ventures which have high failure rates. As a result, the pipeline for ESG ventures is not enough. “There is a lack of high-quality deal flow in ESG,” he adds.
However, given the agriculture and climate-related issues faced in India, there is a huge opportunity for ESG ventures to deliver an internal rate of return (IRR) in the range of 15% to 20%. That level of IRR is necessary for VCs to get interested in such ventures. To deliver such levels of IRR, the projects have to be well thought through, funded, and executed, he says.
Sawhney is of the view that lack of awareness among entrepreneurs is one of the key reasons for the dearth of high-quality ESG ventures in India. “In the US, when someone wants to start up, they first join a course to get a better understanding of the business ecosystem and the do’s and don’ts that they should be mindful of. In India, there are hardly any courses that give entrepreneurs such in-depth knowledge,” he adds.
The government, too, needs to play a significant role in propagating ESG practices among the startup ecosystem, says Sawhney.
“If India wants to mainstream ESG, startups and VCs have to play a key role,” he concludes.
Read MoreThere is a need for a wider research and debate to arrive at the energy specific subsidies, which may be offered to to the socially unprivileged.
New Delhi: There have been recent discussions focusing on energy related support measures, both at the international level as well as within India. Availability of energy, and its affordability, has got severely impacted due to an unexpected military conflict in Europe. This has also halted global energy transition, which was moving at a smooth pace under the net-zero commitments, amidst large-scale adoption of renewables. And, within our own country, a debate has got spurred on energy related support measures for the lesser affluent sections of the society.
As part of our research work, we estimated the consumption of energy, encompassing both electric and non-electric formats, along with the related costs, to arrive at the percentage energy expenditure of an individual as part of her annual income. We undertook this study for the six states of India - Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Punjab.
Our analysis showed that annual per capita consumption of energy was in the range of 300 kgoe, equally split between electrical and non-electrical formats (refer figure 1). Within the fossil group, diesel was having a high share, indicating its widespread use as a commercial fuel. In terms of energy related expenses, our study depicted a range from INR 15,000 - 20,000, with a slightly higher share attributed to non-electric energy (refer figure 2). In terms of energy expenses as a share of annual per capita earnings, this research indicated a range of 12-15%, similar to global average values (refer figure 3).
Per capita income and per capita electricity consumption for these states was obtained from the RBI datasets. State-wise consumption of non-electric fuels (LPG, diesel and gasoline), as taken from PPAC report, was divided by the states’ population to arrive at the per capita energy consumption. Energy consumption in all forms was converted into oil equivalent terms, using standard calorific values. Tariff for electricity was computed by dividing the revenue generated with the sale of power, for domestic category of consumers (PFC dataset). For non-electric fuels, prices as prevalent during March 2019 were taken taken from the portal petroldieselprice.com.
Evolving technologies, innovative business models and opening up of energy markets, accentuated by decarbonization and electrification of the economy, had made it a challenge for the stakeholders in terms of choosing the most optimum format, among all possible permutations. Policy makers may need to choose from the various forms of energy which are required to be subsidized and the possible alternatives.
End-consumers may seek clarity in terms of fuel availability at stable price-points, with minimal change(s) in regulations. For example, subsidized tariff for consumers, amidst increasing prices of LPG and gasoline, may nudge households to adopt induction cookstoves and EVs. Similarly, rationalizing power tariffs and the proposed carbon taxation, under the Energy Conservation Act, may accelerate deployment of solar rooftop systems. Any increase in price of CNG may encourage Bio-CNG based flexi- fuel vehicles. Options shall increase the elasticity of energy consumption, typically considered inelastic.
This calls for a wider research and debate to arrive at the energy specific subsidies, which may be offered to the socially unprivileged. As a first step, minimum lifeline energy requirements can be estimated for different states, considering the existing level of expenses, climatic conditions, besides their social and demographic parameters. Other factors can include locally available fuel esources, conversion technology and the associated energy output (kgoe), market price, carbon intensity along with alternatives.
Subsidies can be extended in terms of total calorific value in place of monetary terms, possibly pegged to their carbon intensity.
This strategy shall enable a consumer opting for the most economical form of energy, which is technologically sound besides being environmentally benign, leading to sustainable and inclusive development of the Indian economy.
[This piece was written exclusively for ETEnergyworld by Dr Sapan Thapar, Head, Department of Sustainable Engineering, TERI School of Advanced Studies].
Date | News Title | Source |
11-November-2022 | TERI School Of Advanced Studie... | India Education Diary (Online) |
11-October-2022 | Mainstreaming sustainability: ... | The Economic Times (Online) |
29-September-2022 | OPINION: Energy expenses and a... | ETEnergyWorld (Online) |
30-June-2022 | A direct approach to conservat... | The Hindu; Page No. 07 |
29-June-2022 | Uttarakhand mein Jal Prabandha... | Hindustan (Hindi Edition Dehradun); Page No. 04 |
29-June-2022 | Raajya Ke 1,219 Praakritik Jha... | Amar Ujjala (Dehradun My City Edtion); Page No. 01 |
26-June-2022 | Heat, pollution hurt health of... | Hindustan Times (Online) |
25-June-2022 | Poor Air Quality, Extreme Weat... | Ahmedabad Mirror (Online) |
30-May-2022 | On hold - Haryana's green ... | The Time of India |
21-May-2022 | Explainer: What is carbon pric... | Moneycontrol(Online) |
The importance of ecosystem services is yet to be fully recognised by India’s policy makers despite the ever-growing threats of extreme weather
Over the course of a few days in August 2018, the village of Mukkodlu, about 15kms from Madikeri, the capital of the district of Kodagu in Karnataka, was washed away by a landslide. Mukkodlu was only one of several villages where houses were completely destroyed by landslides. Kodagu and the people of neighbouring districts of Karnataka, all located on or near the Western Ghats, were still recovering from the extreme rainfalls of late-2018, when heavier and more intense rainfall in 2019 destroyed many more villages and verdant coffee plantations, which this region is known for. In the two years preceding these extreme rainfall events, the region had witnessed one of its worst droughts.
These are just a few incidents of extreme weather wreaking havoc in southern India’s Western Ghats over the past few years. Apart from loss of life and homesteads, peoples’ source of livelihoods has also been severely affected. Inundated as well as drought-stricken coffee plantations have resulted in loss of harvest and destruction of plants. The farmers affected by this are still to recover. Some have gone out of business altogether.
At the same time, multiple projects are being planned through the remaining natural forests of the 1,600-kilometre-long Western Ghats. This despite the region being classified as a hottest hotspot of biological biodiversity by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). A railway line cutting through the Sahyadri mountains, to connect the Northern Karnataka city of Hubli to the coastal town of Ankola, is being planned and highways through the Western Ghats and multiple dam projects have already claimed thousands of trees in protected areas. The region is also exploited for sand mining on its riverbeds and stone quarrying of its rock formations. Many government-sanctioned reports, most famously the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) report, more popularly known as the Gadgil report that was submitted to the government in 2011, have repeatedly warned about the catastrophic damage that is inevitable if India’s forests are sacrificed at the altar of infrastructure, mining and other development.
The report had warned that cultivation of commercial crops on steep slopes was leading to rapid erosion and increased run-off. It had also said there was a need to control the massive encroachment and deforestation in the catchment of major rivers such as the Godavari, Krishna and Cauvery. It also spoke against building large dams in the ecologically sensitive area. It is almost as if scientific knowledge is wilfully ignored by policy makers, even if it’s at the risk of not only the destruction of natural forests, but also of people’s lives and livelihoods. The warnings of such reports have been ignored and the result is that the impact of such extreme weather events is made all the worse as any resident of the Western Ghats region can testify.
Compromised ecosystems
One reason for these extreme weather events to cause more damage than they would have done otherwise is that incessant development has led to ecological balances being disturbed, compromising the ecosystem services that forests and protected areas offer. For example, deforestation in the catchment area of a river reduces the land’s ability to retain water. These compromised ecosystems, combined with the impacts of climate change in such eco-sensitive zones, have increased the intensity and damages from extreme weather events.
As this report stated, out of the 2,592 proposals for projects in Protected Areas (PA) that the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) received for environment clearance in the past six years, more than 87% have been approved. This is based on data available on the ministry’s clearance monitoring website, Parivesh. At the same time, according to a report by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) that was released in February 2020, India’s projected GDP loss due to environmental degradation and future changes in water yield could be as much as $5.9 billion to $9.2 billion.
As the report states, “Nature’s loss undermines our ability to tackle climate change. The second-biggest economic impact from the loss of nature identified through this study relates to its impact on carbon sequestration. If we are to meet climate challenges in an optimal way, we will have to consider nature as a key contributor to the solution. Conversely, nature’s loss undermines our ability to tackle climate change.”
Professor Mahesh Sankaran, an ecosystem and community ecologist at the National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS), Bengaluru, says, “When we convert natural ecosystems such as forests, grasslands and savannas to other ‘human’ land-uses, what we are doing is essentially increasing the production of some services, but decreasing others (i.e. we are trading off between different services). More often than not, we end up increasing ‘provisioning’ services such as food and timber production, but negatively impacting regulating, supporting and cultural services (eg climate and flood regulation, carbon sequestration, regulation of hydrological cycles, eco-tourism).”
Sankaran is part of the Long-term Ecosystem Monitoring Network- India (LEMoN) and has been studying India’s forests for many decades. He adds, “In the long term, this is not a viable option because these other services are critical to ensure the sustainability of even ‘human-dominated’ landscapes and ensure our quality of life. Biodiversity loss, land conversion and degradation are also well recognised to negatively influence the ability of systems to deal with extreme climatic events such as droughts and extreme rainfall events, and can result, for example, in increased flooding.”
According to a MoEF&CC report published 11 years ago, India’s forests absorb more than 10% of the country’s greenhouse gases. This August 2009 report values India’s ‘ecosystem services’ at 4.2% of India’s GDP or Rs6 lakh crore ($120 billion). While there has been recognition of the value that forests provide, there has been little action on the ground to dissuade development in eco-sensitive regions. The landslides, flooding and the loss of lives and livelihoods in recent years is the tremendous price that is being paid for this inaction.
Different models of development
Thousands of Goans had come out earlier this month to protest against their state government’s move to expand railway lines for transporting coal, at the cost of destroying national parks and wildlife sanctuaries in the state.
During the lockdown, among the 30 forest clearance proposals discussed by the National Board for Wildlife (NBW) were the proposals to develop railway lines through the Bhagwan Mahaveer Widlife Sanctuary and the Mollem National Park. If the projects go ahead, they will lead to the cutting of nearly 60,000 trees in these protected regions, diverting 170 hectares of forests for development. The Goan citizenry have decided that this development at the cost of their state’s forests is unwarranted and have taken to the streets to make their voices heard. The protestors say they are not against development but they don’t want to lose out on the environmental and economic benefits that these forests provide them. The forests are eco-tourism hotspots and are the source for multiple rivers, which act as the lifeline for Goa’s water supply. The benefits that the railway lines will bring will be much lesser than the value of the ecosystem services that these forests offer.
Experts state the idea of looking at environmental resources as being obstructive to economic development is outdated. As Professor Nandan Nawn, an economist who specialises in environment and development at TERI School of Advanced Studies (TERI SAS), New Delhi, says, “Reports such as the Gadgil report recommended putting some restrictions on some areas, no doubt, but also regulated use. Unfortunately, any kind of regulation is construed to be an anathema to economic growth. It is conveniently forgotten that the market itself is an institution and its efficient functioning requires a robust and functioning regulatory framework. Perhaps the short-term considerations of the elected governments take priority over sustainability of gains. The values derived by the resource people are mostly outside the market, and hence do not get reported in the GDP calculations.”
Professor Nawn, who specialises in environment and development, political economy and ecological economics, however, feels there are different, more sustainable models of development that are gaining a foothold in India and across the world. As he says, “However, things are changing. The System of Environmental Economic Accounting (SEEA) of the United Nations is about to be implemented in India soon. Among others, it extends the same treatment to depletion of natural capital as to the physical capital. At least, we will be able to know how much loss is taking place every year. Also, the pandemic had induced a large-scale urban to rural migration. Governments will be compelled to provide livelihood opportunities to these people. A bioeconomy is the easiest answer.”
Institutions such as the Biodiversity Management Committee, which is in place at the panchayat level, still largely remain toothless though. While such institutions provide a good framework, the need of the hour is to implement such sustainable models. Professor Jagdish Krishnaswamy of the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE) says, “Ecosystem services are irreplaceable and it’s largely not helpful to look at the environment in economic terms. Our forests are our ecological assets. Clearly, they have to be a big part of our strategy for our future.”
Professor Krishnaswamy has researched extensively on various vegetation’s response to changes in climate and land cover change in India. He adds, “I personally think ecosystem services should be quantified in biophysical and socio-economic terms. We should be thinking in terms of quantifications, jobs provided through resources such as non-timber forest produce or capture fisheries in marine ecosystems or rivers. These kinds of services also provide food security for many forest-dependent people across India.”
The forest-dependent people, who are estimated to be anywhere from 275 to 400 million, are the worst-affected both by development that engulfs forest ecosystems as well as the impacts of climate change. As Professor Shankaran says, “We will need to rethink our approach. We need to stop making land-use decisions that prioritise short-term economic gains at the cost of longer-term losses in ecosystem service provisioning. Human well-being and quality of life does not just depend on the economic benefits that we derive from ecosystems, but also on these other non-material benefits.” Laws such as the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, which are meant to act as a safety net for the forest-dependant people are either not applied or provisions made in the law are revoked or diluted, many times with other government ministry’s, such as the environment ministry, blocking the affecting implementation of the law.
This is the second installment in an in-depth three-part series on India’s forest conservation and afforestation policies on Carbon Copy. The third part will explore the double-squeeze experienced by forest-dependent people facing the brunt of both law and climate impacts.
Sibi Arasu is an independent journalist based in Bangalore.
Plot No. 10, Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi - 110 070, India.
Tel. +91 11 71800222 (25 lines).
Website : www.terisas.ac.in
Email id : registrar@terisas.ac.in
Site Map
© Copyright © 2023, TERI SAS, All rights reserved.